RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

Place in the ranking	216	18
Place by popularity	82	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	58.37	6.88
Power efficiency	16.68	17.25
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 24	AD102
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)	3 December 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6500 XT has 748% better value for money than RTX 6000 Ada Generation.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	18176
Core clock speed	2610 MHz	915 MHz
Boost clock speed	2815 MHz	2505 MHz
Number of transistors	5,400 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	107 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	180.2	1,423
Floating-point processing power	5.765 TFLOPS	91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	192
TMUs	64	568
Tensor Cores	no data	568
Ray Tracing Cores	16	142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2248 MHz	2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	143.9 GB/s	960.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a	4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6500 XT 24.79

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 71.86
+190%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6500 XT 9565

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 27724
+190%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6500 XT 76445

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 126448
+65.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6500 XT 22954

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 70850
+209%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6500 XT 15712

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 36679
+133%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	66 −176%	182 +176%
1440p	33 −379%	158 +379%
4K	16 −606%	113 +606%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

72
−178%

200−210

+178%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −178%	150−160 +178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	51 −159%	130−140 +159%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −190%	230−240 +190%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −140%	120−130 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 −178%	150−160 +178%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −105%	110−120 +105%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −177%	180−190 +177%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −66.9%	240−250 +66.9%
Hitman 3	50−55 −158%	120−130 +158%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −132%	260−270 +132%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −82.4%	150−160 +82.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −92.2%	120−130 +92.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −271%	300−350 +271%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −48.5%	150−160 +48.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −178%	150−160 +178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	43 −207%	130−140 +207%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −190%	230−240 +190%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −140%	120−130 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 −179%	95−100 +179%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −105%	110−120 +105%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −177%	180−190 +177%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −66.9%	240−250 +66.9%
Hitman 3	50−55 −158%	120−130 +158%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −132%	260−270 +132%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −82.4%	150−160 +82.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −92.2%	120−130 +92.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	107 −192%	300−350 +192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −200%	150−160 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −48.5%	150−160 +48.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −178%	150−160 +178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	31 −326%	130−140 +326%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −140%	120−130 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 −183%	85−90 +183%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −105%	110−120 +105%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −66.9%	240−250 +66.9%
Hitman 3	50−55 −158%	120−130 +158%
Horizon Zero Dawn	92 −187%	260−270 +187%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	83 −276%	300−350 +276%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 −381%	260 +381%
Watch Dogs: Legion	25 −512%	150−160 +512%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65

−92.2%

120−130
+92.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −253%	160−170 +253%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −195%	110−120 +195%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −235%	85−90 +235%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	23 −309%	90−95 +309%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −193%	80−85 +193%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 −165%	45−50 +165%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −200%	80−85 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −92.2%	270−280 +92.2%
Hitman 3	27−30 −269%	100−110 +269%
Horizon Zero Dawn	66 −186%	180−190 +186%
Metro Exodus	57 −73.7%	99 +73.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	56 −279%	210−220 +279%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −630%	219 +630%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 −71.4%	240−250 +71.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−188%

110−120
+188%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −267%	85−90 +267%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −263%	65−70 +263%
Hitman 3	10 −550%	65−70 +550%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +46%	87 −46%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −325%	110−120 +325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 −557%	184 +557%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −307%	60−65 +307%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6 −883%	55−60 +883%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −271%	50−55 +271%
Cyberpunk 2077	4 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −257%	50−55 +257%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −288%	130−140 +288%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	25 −372%	110−120 +372%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10 −380%	45−50 +380%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−290%

80−85
+290%

This is how RX 6500 XT and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 176% faster in 1080p
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 379% faster in 1440p
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 606% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6500 XT is 46% faster.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 883% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6500 XT is ahead in 1 test (2%)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is ahead in 65 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.79	71.86
Recency	19 January 2022	3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	48 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	107 Watt	300 Watt

RX 6500 XT has 180.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 189.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6500 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6500 XT is a desktop card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.