RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
2023
12 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
50.01
+8.6%

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5972
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation85.6981.58
Power efficiency14.4347.49
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 22AD107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 October 2023 (1 year ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$334 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has 5% better value for money than RTX 2000 Ada Generation.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602816
Core clock speed2321 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed2581 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate413.0187.4
Floating-point processing power13.21 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs16088
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Cores4022

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 50.01
+8.6%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 46.07

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 19296
+8.5%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17778

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 50.01 46.07
Recency 17 October 2023 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 70 Watt

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has a 8.6% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and RTX 2000 Ada Generation.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is a desktop card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 145 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.