GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB vs Radeon RX 6400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking277not rated
Place by popularity100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation53.21no data
Power efficiency25.69no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNavi 24GM204
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 January 2022 (2 years ago)9 January 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024
Core clock speed1923 MHz935 MHz
Boost clock speed2321 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)53 Wattno data
Texture fill rate111.473.60
Floating-point processing power3.565 TFLOPS2.355 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4864
Ray Tracing Cores12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4MXM-B (3.0)
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s80.19 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 January 2022 9 January 2015
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm

RX 6400 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6400 and GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB
GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1863 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 23 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.