Radeon RX 6400 vs GeForce GTX 970M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 970M with Radeon RX 6400, including specs and performance data.

GTX 970M
2014
6 GB GDDR5
14.86

RX 6400 outperforms GTX 970M by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking334269
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.1412.44
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGM204Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 October 2014 (9 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,560.89 $159
Current price$848 (0.3x MSRP)$376 (2.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6400 has 200% better value for money than GTX 970M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280768
CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed924 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1038 MHz2321 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown53 Watt
Texture fill rate83.04111.4
Floating-point performance2,657 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 970M and Radeon RX 6400 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth120 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 970M 14.86
RX 6400 19.55
+31.6%

Radeon RX 6400 outperforms GeForce GTX 970M by 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 970M 5739
RX 6400 7550
+31.6%

Radeon RX 6400 outperforms GeForce GTX 970M by 32% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p136
−25%
170−180
+25%
Full HD59
−27.1%
75−80
+27.1%
1440p25
−20%
30−35
+20%
4K22
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−43.8%
21−24
+43.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
−40%
42
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−48.6%
52
+48.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−43.8%
21−24
+43.8%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−42.9%
50
+42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−37.1%
48
+37.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−35.6%
61
+35.6%
Hitman 3 21−24
−38.1%
27−30
+38.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−33.3%
60−65
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−32.5%
53
+32.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−36.7%
40−45
+36.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−34.3%
45−50
+34.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−37.1%
45−50
+37.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−33.3%
36
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−46.7%
44
+46.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−43.8%
21−24
+43.8%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−36.7%
41
+36.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−37%
37
+37%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−37.9%
131
+37.9%
Hitman 3 21−24
−38.1%
27−30
+38.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−33.3%
60−65
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−33.3%
40
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−36.7%
40−45
+36.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−34.3%
45−50
+34.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−50%
45
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−37.1%
45−50
+37.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−50%
21
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−43.8%
21−24
+43.8%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−38.1%
29
+38.1%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−33.3%
36
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−33.3%
60−65
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−34.3%
45−50
+34.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−44.4%
26
+44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−37.1%
45−50
+37.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−36.7%
40−45
+36.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−44.4%
26
+44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−33.3%
28
+33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−41.7%
17
+41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−50%
27
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−43.8%
23
+43.8%
Hitman 3 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−38.9%
25
+38.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−33.3%
12
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−44.4%
13
+44.4%
Hitman 3 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−50%
9
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−33.3%
16
+33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−33.3%
8
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−50%
6
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−33.3%
12
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%

This is how GTX 970M and RX 6400 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6400 is 25% faster in 900p
  • RX 6400 is 27% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6400 is 20% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6400 is 23% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.86 19.55
Recency 7 October 2014 19 January 2022
Cost $2560.89 $159
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

The Radeon RX 6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 970M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GeForce GTX 970M
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 293 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1718 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.