GeForce MX330 vs Radeon RX 640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 640 and GeForce MX330, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 640
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
5.32

MX330 outperforms RX 640 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking616577
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.2943.12
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 23GP108
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 May 2019 (5 years ago)10 February 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640384
Core clock speed1082 MHz1531 MHz
Boost clock speed1218 MHz1594 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate48.7238.26
Floating-point processing power1.559 TFLOPS1.224 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 640 5.32
GeForce MX330 6.29
+18.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 640 2049
GeForce MX330 2424
+18.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 640 5235
+8.3%
GeForce MX330 4834

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 640 3499
GeForce MX330 3762
+7.5%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 640 19946
GeForce MX330 20729
+3.9%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 640 1008
GeForce MX330 1160
+15.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
+22.7%
22
−22.7%
4K18−21
−33.3%
24
+33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
+5.3%
19
−5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−80%
9
+80%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−90.9%
21
+90.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−92.9%
27
+92.9%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−28.1%
40−45
+28.1%
Hitman 3 10−12
−45.5%
16
+45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−258%
118
+258%
Metro Exodus 27
+0%
27
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 26
+0%
26
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−70.2%
80
+70.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−57.1%
22
+57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−60%
8
+60%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+10%
10
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−63.6%
18
+63.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−35.7%
19
+35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−28.1%
40−45
+28.1%
Hitman 3 10−12
−36.4%
15
+36.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−221%
106
+221%
Metro Exodus 10
−110%
21
+110%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−42.9%
20
+42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−59.6%
75
+59.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+100%
7
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+175%
4
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−9.1%
12
+9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+100%
16
−100%
Hitman 3 10−12
−18.2%
13
+18.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+106%
16
−106%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−9.1%
12
+9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−8.5%
50−55
+8.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+55.6%
9
−55.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−66.7%
20−22
+66.7%
Hitman 3 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Hitman 3 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how RX 640 and GeForce MX330 compete in popular games:

  • RX 640 is 23% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX330 is 33% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 640 is 175% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX330 is 258% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 640 is ahead in 7 tests (10%)
  • GeForce MX330 is ahead in 57 tests (81%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.32 6.29
Recency 13 May 2019 10 February 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 10 Watt

GeForce MX330 has a 18.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX330 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 640 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 640
Radeon RX 640
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GeForce MX330

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 256 votes

Rate Radeon RX 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 2196 votes

Rate GeForce MX330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.