Radeon R5 A335 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking132not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.87no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameTU104Exo
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)21 October 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072320
Core clock speed1035 MHz1070 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Wattno data
Texture fill rate296.621.40
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPS0.6848 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs19220
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 21 October 2015
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm

RTX 5000 Mobile has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and Radeon R5 A335. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon R5 A335 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMD Radeon R5 A335
Radeon R5 A335

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 34 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R5 A335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.