Radeon 760M vs RX 6300M

Radeon RX 6300M Radeon RX 6500 Radeon RX 6500M Radeon RX 6550M Radeon RX 6600M Radeon RX 6600S Radeon RX 6650M Radeon RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6700M Radeon RX 6700S Radeon RX 6800M Radeon RX 6800S Radeon RX 6850M XT
VS
Radeon 540 Radeon 550X Radeon 760M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6300M with Radeon 760M, including specs and performance data.

RX 6300M
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
16.67
+11.9%

RX 6300M outperforms 760M by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX 6300M RX 6300M
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking328354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency32.6568.10
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 24Phoenix
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768512
Core clock speed2000 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz2599 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate115.283.17
Floating-point processing power3.686 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs4832
Ray Tracing Cores128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width32 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6300M 16.67
+11.9%
Radeon 760M 14.90

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6300M 6422
+11.8%
Radeon 760M 5743

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+9.4%
32
−9.4%
1440p21−24
+10.5%
19
−10.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1400%
30
+1400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1450%
30−35
+1450%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24
+1100%
Hitman 3 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−863%
75−80
+863%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−182%
75−80
+182%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1450%
30−35
+1450%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−800%
18
+800%
Hitman 3 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−863%
75−80
+863%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1000%
44
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−300%
35−40
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−182%
75−80
+182%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1450%
30−35
+1450%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Hitman 3 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−863%
75−80
+863%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−825%
37
+825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−156%
23
+156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−182%
75−80
+182%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 8−9
Hitman 3 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−1450%
30−35
+1450%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 7−8

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how RX 6300M and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6300M is 9% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6300M is 11% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 760M is 1450% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 760M is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 16.67 14.90
Recency 4 January 2022 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

RX 6300M has a 11.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 760M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 760M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6300M is a notebook card while Radeon 760M is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX 6300M
Radeon RX 6300M
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
vs
R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
vs
GTX 680M SLI GeForce GTX 680M SLI
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
vs
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
vs
GTX 1630 GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile
Radeon 660M Radeon 660M
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
RX 6500M Radeon RX 6500M
vs
RTX 4050 Max-Q GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
UHD Graphics 48EU UHD Graphics 48EU
vs
Arc A770M Arc A770M
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
vs
Tesla C1080 Tesla C1080
RTX 4080 GeForce RTX 4080
vs
L20 L20
Arc 7 A770M Arc 7 A770M
vs
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
Arc A730M Arc A730M
vs
RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 191 vote

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.