Tesla K80m vs Radeon RX 5600 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking141not rated
Place by popularity79not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.76no data
Power efficiency16.30no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameNavi 10GK210
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date21 January 2020 (4 years ago)17 November 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042x 2496
Core clock speed1130 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz824 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate224.62x 182.2 billion/sec
Floating-point processing power7.188 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642x 48
TMUs1442x 208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2x 12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s2x 240.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 (11_1)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 January 2020 17 November 2014
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 300 Watt

RX 5600 XT has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5600 XT and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5600 XT is a desktop card while Tesla K80m is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2702 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.