Tesla K80m vs Radeon RX 5500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking247not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.25no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameNavi 14GK210
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 October 2019 (5 years ago)17 November 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14082x 2496
Core clock speedno data562 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHz824 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate162.42x 182.2 billion/sec
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322x 48
TMUs882x 208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length180 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x 12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s2x 240.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL4.64.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 October 2019 17 November 2014
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 300 Watt

RX 5500 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 172.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5500 and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5500 is a desktop card while Tesla K80m is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5500
Radeon RX 5500
NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 221 vote

Rate Radeon RX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.