Quadro P5000 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT

Place in the ranking	145	168
Place by popularity	80	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	52.66	6.69
Power efficiency	16.18	12.56
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Navi 10	GP104
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	21 January 2020 (5 years ago)	1 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$279	$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5600 XT has 687% better value for money than Quadro P5000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	2048
Core clock speed	1130 MHz	1607 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	1733 MHz
Number of transistors	10,300 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	224.6	277.3
Floating-point processing power	7.188 TFLOPS	8.873 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	144	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	1127 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	192 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	-
Display Port	no data	1.4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	-	+
3D Stereo	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5600 XT 33.66
+7.4%

Quadro P5000 31.35

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5600 XT 13556
+7.4%

Quadro P5000 12624

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	108 +10.2%	98 −10.2%
1440p	63 +14.5%	55−60 −14.5%
4K	35 −14.3%	40 +14.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.58 +887%	25.50 −887%
1440p	4.43 +926%	45.44 −926%
4K	7.97 +684%	62.48 −684%

RX 5600 XT has 887% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 5600 XT has 926% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 5600 XT has 684% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	77 +18.5%	65−70 −18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	83 +20.3%	65−70 −20.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +4.3%	90−95 −4.3%
Counter-Strike 2	63 −3.2%	65−70 +3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	69 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	190 +24.2%	150−160 −24.2%
Forza Horizon 5	121 +42.4%	85−90 −42.4%
Metro Exodus	139 +69.5%	80−85 −69.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	112 +67.2%	65−70 −67.2%
Valorant	179 +37.7%	130−140 −37.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +4.3%	90−95 −4.3%
Counter-Strike 2	53 −22.6%	65−70 +22.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	59 −16.9%	65−70 +16.9%
Dota 2	146 +36.4%	100−110 −36.4%
Far Cry 5	66 −34.8%	85−90 +34.8%
Fortnite	160−170 +5.3%	150−160 −5.3%
Forza Horizon 4	158 +3.3%	150−160 −3.3%
Forza Horizon 5	91 +7.1%	85−90 −7.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	126 +17.8%	100−110 −17.8%
Metro Exodus	94 +14.6%	80−85 −14.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +3.2%	180−190 −3.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	53 −26.4%	65−70 +26.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +8.9%	110−120 −8.9%
Valorant	87 −49.4%	130−140 +49.4%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0.4%	270−280 −0.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +4.3%	90−95 −4.3%
Counter-Strike 2	47 −38.3%	65−70 +38.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	50 −38%	65−70 +38%
Dota 2	168 +57%	100−110 −57%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +4.5%	85−90 −4.5%
Forza Horizon 4	141 −8.5%	150−160 +8.5%
Forza Horizon 5	85 +0%	85−90 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +3.2%	180−190 −3.2%
Valorant	148 +13.8%	130−140 −13.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	61 +3.4%	55−60 −3.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	61 +3.4%	55−60 −3.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +2.5%	150−160 −2.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35 +12.9%	30−35 −12.9%
World of Tanks	220−230 +6.6%	210−220 −6.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +4.7%	60−65 −4.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 −3.3%	30−35 +3.3%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +8.7%	100−110 −8.7%
Forza Horizon 4	97 +6.6%	90−95 −6.6%
Forza Horizon 5	59 +9.3%	50−55 −9.3%
Metro Exodus	88 +20.5%	70−75 −20.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +11.3%	50−55 −11.3%
Valorant	97 +1%	95−100 −1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +7.7%	12−14 −7.7%
Dota 2	63 +3.3%	60−65 −3.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	63 +3.3%	60−65 −3.3%
Metro Exodus	30 +15.4%	24−27 −15.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +8.7%	100−110 −8.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	23 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	63 +3.3%	60−65 −3.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +8.1%	35−40 −8.1%
Counter-Strike 2	6 −117%	12−14 +117%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Dota 2	99 +62.3%	60−65 −62.3%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +8.7%	45−50 −8.7%
Fortnite	45−50 +9.1%	40−45 −9.1%
Forza Horizon 4	57 +7.5%	50−55 −7.5%
Forza Horizon 5	30 +3.4%	27−30 −3.4%
Valorant	38 −28.9%	45−50 +28.9%

This is how RX 5600 XT and Quadro P5000 compete in popular games:

RX 5600 XT is 10% faster in 1080p
RX 5600 XT is 15% faster in 1440p
Quadro P5000 is 14% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5600 XT is 70% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P5000 is 117% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 5600 XT is ahead in 48 tests (76%)
Quadro P5000 is ahead in 13 tests (21%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.66	31.35
Recency	21 January 2020	1 October 2016
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	100 Watt