Quadro P2000 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT

Place in the ranking	145	297
Place by popularity	80	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	53.53	9.56
Power efficiency	16.19	17.36
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Navi 10	GP106
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	21 January 2020 (5 years ago)	6 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$279	$585

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5600 XT has 460% better value for money than Quadro P2000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1024
Core clock speed	1130 MHz	1076 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	1480 MHz
Number of transistors	10,300 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	224.6	94.72
Floating-point processing power	7.188 TFLOPS	3.031 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	40
TMUs	144	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	201 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	5 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	140.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5600 XT 35.27
+86.5%

Quadro P2000 18.91

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5600 XT 13560
+86.6%

Quadro P2000 7268

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 5600 XT 31310
+273%

Quadro P2000 8387

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 5600 XT 86004
+161%

Quadro P2000 32964

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5600 XT 22058
+222%

Quadro P2000 6847

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5600 XT 115838
+166%

Quadro P2000 43566

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5600 XT 548796
+56.7%

Quadro P2000 350317

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	108 +86.2%	58 −86.2%
1440p	62 +210%	20 −210%
4K	36 +112%	17 −112%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.58 +290%	10.09 −290%
1440p	4.50 +550%	29.25 −550%
4K	7.75 +344%	34.41 −344%

RX 5600 XT has 290% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 5600 XT has 550% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 5600 XT has 344% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	77 +126%	30−35 −126%
Cyberpunk 2077	83 +124%	35−40 −124%
Elden Ring	113 +88.3%	60−65 −88.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +63.3%	60−65 −63.3%
Counter-Strike 2	63 +85.3%	30−35 −85.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	69 +86.5%	35−40 −86.5%
Forza Horizon 4	190 +141%	75−80 −141%
Metro Exodus	139 +173%	50−55 −173%
Red Dead Redemption 2	112 +155%	40−45 −155%
Valorant	179 +136%	75−80 −136%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +63.3%	60−65 −63.3%
Counter-Strike 2	53 +55.9%	30−35 −55.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	59 +59.5%	35−40 −59.5%
Dota 2	146 +329%	34 −329%
Elden Ring	141 +135%	60−65 −135%
Far Cry 5	66 −9.1%	72 +9.1%
Fortnite	160−170 +58.4%	100−110 −58.4%
Forza Horizon 4	158 +100%	75−80 −100%
Grand Theft Auto V	126 +88.1%	65−70 −88.1%
Metro Exodus	94 +84.3%	50−55 −84.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +39.4%	137 −39.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	53 +20.5%	40−45 −20.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +107%	55−60 −107%
Valorant	87 +14.5%	75−80 −14.5%
World of Tanks	270−280 +24.6%	220−230 −24.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +63.3%	60−65 −63.3%
Counter-Strike 2	47 +38.2%	30−35 −38.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	50 +35.1%	35−40 −35.1%
Dota 2	168 +71.4%	98 −71.4%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +43.8%	60−65 −43.8%
Forza Horizon 4	141 +78.5%	75−80 −78.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +378%	40 −378%
Valorant	148 +94.7%	75−80 −94.7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	61 +110%	27−30 −110%
Elden Ring	67 +116%	30−35 −116%
Grand Theft Auto V	61 +103%	30−33 −103%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +4.2%	160−170 −4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35 +106%	16−18 −106%
World of Tanks	220−230 +74.4%	120−130 −74.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +76.3%	35−40 −76.3%
Counter-Strike 2	29 +81.3%	16−18 −81.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +100%	14−16 −100%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +126%	50−55 −126%
Forza Horizon 4	97 +102%	45−50 −102%
Metro Exodus	88 +105%	40−45 −105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +136%	24−27 −136%
Valorant	97 +102%	45−50 −102%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	19 +26.7%	14−16 −26.7%
Dota 2	63 +96.9%	30−35 −96.9%
Elden Ring	25 +78.6%	14−16 −78.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	63 +96.9%	30−35 −96.9%
Metro Exodus	30 +114%	14−16 −114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +187%	39 −187%
Red Dead Redemption 2	23 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	63 +96.9%	30−35 −96.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +111%	18−20 −111%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +133%	14−16 −133%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 +100%	6−7 −100%
Dota 2	99 +209%	30−35 −209%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +108%	24−27 −108%
Fortnite	45−50 +118%	21−24 −118%
Forza Horizon 4	57 +104%	27−30 −104%
Valorant	38 +72.7%	21−24 −72.7%

This is how RX 5600 XT and Quadro P2000 compete in popular games:

RX 5600 XT is 86% faster in 1080p
RX 5600 XT is 210% faster in 1440p
RX 5600 XT is 112% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5600 XT is 378% faster.
in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P2000 is 9% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 5600 XT is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
Quadro P2000 is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.27	18.91
Recency	21 January 2020	6 February 2017
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	5 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	75 Watt

RX 5600 XT has a 86.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 20% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro P2000, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5600 XT is a desktop card while Quadro P2000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.