Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon RX 5300M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5300M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5300M
2019
3 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
11.66
+23.1%

RX 5300M outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking410467
Place by popularitynot in top-10087
Power efficiency9.4023.19
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 14Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140896
Core clock speed1000 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1445 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate127.2no data
Floating-point processing power4.069 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs88no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount3 GBno data
Memory bus width96 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth168.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5300M 11.66
+23.1%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 9.47

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 5300M 14351
+121%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 6504

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 5300M 39264
+51.1%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 25978

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5300M 10306
+101%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5139

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5300M 55837
+107%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 26982

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 5300M 3567
+129%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 1560

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD61
+135%
26
−135%
1440p18−20
+20%
15
−20%
4K12−14
+9.1%
11
−9.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−17.6%
20
+17.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 59
+168%
22
−168%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−23.5%
21
+23.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+20.7%
27−30
−20.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51
+41.7%
36
−41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+6.3%
16
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 70
+218%
21−24
−218%
Far Cry New Dawn 79
+204%
24−27
−204%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+17.5%
60−65
−17.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
−14.3%
24
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−107%
124
+107%
Metro Exodus 87
+149%
35
−149%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+318%
17
−318%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+16.1%
30−35
−16.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−34.3%
90
+34.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+13%
21−24
−13%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−5.9%
18
+5.9%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+20.7%
27−30
−20.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 41
+28.1%
32
−28.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+30.8%
13
−30.8%
Far Cry 5 61
+177%
21−24
−177%
Far Cry New Dawn 54
+108%
24−27
−108%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+17.5%
60−65
−17.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
−9.5%
23
+9.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−86.7%
112
+86.7%
Metro Exodus 68
+143%
28
−143%
Red Dead Redemption 2 59
+127%
26
−127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+20%
30
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+11.5%
24−27
−11.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−25.4%
84
+25.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
+78.6%
14
−78.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 22
−4.5%
23
+4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+54.5%
11
−54.5%
Far Cry 5 38
+72.7%
21−24
−72.7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+17.5%
60−65
−17.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
+5%
20
−5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+161%
23
−161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+50%
24
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
+171%
14
−171%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+9.8%
60−65
−9.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 53
+279%
14
−279%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−40%
7
+40%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+26.8%
40−45
−26.8%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+15%
20−22
−15%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−18.8%
19
+18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+16.7%
60−65
−16.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Hitman 3 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+30.8%
35−40
−30.8%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−33.3%
12
+33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−37.5%
11
+37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

This is how RX 5300M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

  • RX 5300M is 135% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5300M is 20% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5300M is 9% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5300M is 318% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 107% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5300M is ahead in 57 tests (79%)
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is ahead in 14 tests (19%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.66 9.47
Recency 13 November 2019 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 28 Watt

RX 5300M has a 23.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 203.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 96 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 982 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.