GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs Radeon RX 5300M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking419not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.08no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNavi 14GM206
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)17 November 2015 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408512
Core clock speed1000 MHz1087 MHz
Boost clock speed1445 MHz1239 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Wattno data
Texture fill rate127.239.65
Floating-point processing power4.069 TFLOPS1.269 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB2 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.0 GB/s80.19 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 November 2019 17 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm

RX 5300M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5300M and GeForce GTX 750 GM206. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5300M is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 750 GM206 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206
GeForce GTX 750 GM206

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 96 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 7 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 GM206 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.