GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs Radeon RX 5300M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5300M with GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, including specs and performance data.

RX 5300M
2019
3 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
12.87

RTX 3050 4 GB outperforms RX 5300M by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking392311
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.05
Power efficiency10.4213.64
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 14GA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)27 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14082048
Core clock speed1000 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speed1445 MHz1740 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate127.2111.4
Floating-point processing power4.069 TFLOPS7.127 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5300M 12.87
RTX 3050 4 GB 17.83
+38.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5300M 4947
RTX 3050 4 GB 6853
+38.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD61
−31.1%
80−85
+31.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.49

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Elden Ring 35−40
−31.6%
50−55
+31.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 66
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−34.6%
70−75
+34.6%
Metro Exodus 69
−37.7%
95−100
+37.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
−33.8%
95−100
+33.8%
Valorant 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−31%
55−60
+31%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Dota 2 76
−31.6%
100−105
+31.6%
Elden Ring 35−40
−31.6%
50−55
+31.6%
Far Cry 5 35
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
Fortnite 70−75
−37%
100−105
+37%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−34.6%
70−75
+34.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
−32.8%
85−90
+32.8%
Metro Exodus 46
−30.4%
60−65
+30.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−36.8%
130−140
+36.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%
Valorant 43
−27.9%
55−60
+27.9%
World of Tanks 170−180
−37.9%
240−250
+37.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 49
−32.7%
65−70
+32.7%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Dota 2 95
−36.8%
130−140
+36.8%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−32.7%
65−70
+32.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−34.6%
70−75
+34.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−36.8%
130−140
+36.8%
Valorant 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Elden Ring 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
−34.8%
120−130
+34.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
World of Tanks 90−95
−31.9%
120−130
+31.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Valorant 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Dota 2 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Elden Ring 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−31.6%
50−55
+31.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Dota 2 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Fortnite 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Valorant 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%

This is how RX 5300M and RTX 3050 4 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4 GB is 31% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.87 17.83
Recency 13 November 2019 27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 90 Watt

RX 5300M has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 5.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 4 GB, on the other hand, has a 38.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5300M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5300M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 96 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2682 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.