GeForce G102M vs Radeon RX 480

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	247	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	15.63	no data
Power efficiency	10.31	no data
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	Ellesmere	C79
GCN generation	4th Gen	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	29 June 2016 (8 years ago)	8 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$229	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	16
Compute units	36	no data
Core clock speed	1120 MHz	450 MHz
Boost clock speed	1266 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,700 million	314 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	14 Watt
Texture fill rate	182.3	3.600
Floating-point processing power	5.834 TFLOPS	0.0352 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	no data	48
ROPs	32	4
TMUs	144	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	n/a	PCI-E 1.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data
Bridgeless CrossFire	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	Up to 512 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224 GB/s	6.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	VGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS
Multi monitor support	no data	+
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	2.0	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
DisplayPort support	1.4HDR	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	n/a	-
CrossFire	+	-
Enduro	n/a	-
FRTC	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	n/a	-
LiquidVR	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
TressFX	+	-
TrueAudio	n/a	-
ZeroCore	+	-
UVD	+	-
VCE	+	-
Power management	no data	8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.4	4.0
OpenGL	4.5	2.1
OpenCL	2.0	N/A
Vulkan	+	N/A
Mantle	n/a	-
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	29 June 2016	8 January 2009
Chip lithography	14 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	14 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---