Radeon R9 M295X vs RX 480 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated382
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.73
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameEllesmereAmethyst
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 August 2016 (8 years ago)23 November 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042048
Core clock speed1000 MHz723 MHz
Boost clock speed1077 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate155.192.54
Floating-point processing power4.963 TFLOPS2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs144128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5Not Listed
Maximum RAM amount8 GB0 MB
Memory bus width256 BitNot Listed
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)Not Listed
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.0Not Listed
Vulkan1.2.131-
Mantle-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2016 23 November 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 250 Watt

RX 480 Mobile has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 480 Mobile and Radeon R9 M295X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile
Radeon RX 480 Mobile
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 20 votes

Rate Radeon RX 480 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 17 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.