Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs R9 M295X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M295X
2014
0 MB Not Listed, 250 Watt
13.35

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking379378
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.703.71
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameAmethystAmethyst
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 November 2014 (9 years ago)23 November 2014 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed723 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate92.54108.8
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS3.482 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs128128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount0 MB4 GB
Memory bus widthNot Listed256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1362 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s174.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNot Listed12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.36.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
Mantle+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
4K27
+0%
27−30
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
Hitman 3 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
Hitman 3 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
Hitman 3 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+3.1%
65−70
−3.1%
Hitman 3 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+3.8%
80−85
−3.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how R9 M295X and R9 M295X Mac Edition compete in popular games:

  • R9 M295X is 2% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.35 13.39

R9 M295X Mac Edition has a 0.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 17 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.