GRID M3-3020 vs Radeon R9 M470X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M470X with GRID M3-3020, including specs and performance data.

R9 M470X
2016
4 GB GDDR5
8.41
+9.8%

R9 M470X outperforms GRID M3-3020 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking498522
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameEmeraldGM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)18 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896640
Core clock speed1000 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1306 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate61.6052.24
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPS1.672 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs5640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s83.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+12%
50−55
−12%
Hitman 3 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+16%
50−55
−16%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+12%
50−55
−12%
Hitman 3 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+16%
50−55
−16%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+12%
50−55
−12%
Hitman 3 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+16%
50−55
−16%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Hitman 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.41 7.66

R9 M470X has a 9.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 M470X and GRID M3-3020.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M470X is a notebook card while GRID M3-3020 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M470X
Radeon R9 M470X
NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GRID M3-3020

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M470X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.