GeForce MX250 vs Radeon R9 M370X

Place in the ranking	692	577
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	43.56
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Cape Verde	GP108B
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	19 May 2015 (9 years ago)	20 February 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	384
Core clock speed	800 MHz	937 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1038 MHz
Number of transistors	1500 Million	1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	10 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	24.91
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.7972 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	16
TMUs	no data	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x4
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	48.06 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (FL 11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.7 (6.4)
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M370X 4.03

GeForce MX250 6.26
+55.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M370X 1554

GeForce MX250 2413
+55.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 M370X 3638

GeForce MX250 4633
+27.4%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R9 M370X 13155

GeForce MX250 16488
+25.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 M370X 2419

GeForce MX250 3660
+51.3%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R9 M370X 15455

GeForce MX250 21545
+39.4%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R9 M370X 188948

GeForce MX250 235421
+24.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

32
+45.5%

−45.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8

−100%

14
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −72.7%	19 +72.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −333%	13 +333%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −133%	21 +133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −100%	18 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −57.1%	11 +57.1%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −175%	22 +175%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −145%	27 +145%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −91.7%	46 +91.7%
Hitman 3	9−10 −77.8%	16 +77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −337%	118 +337%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −213%	25 +213%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −180%	28 +180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −133%	35 +133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −76.7%	76 +76.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −118%	24 +118%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −88.9%	17 +88.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −88.9%	17 +88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −138%	19 +138%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −54.5%	17 +54.5%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −79.2%	43 +79.2%
Hitman 3	9−10 −77.8%	16 +77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −326%	115 +326%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −138%	19 +138%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −60%	16 +60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −46.7%	22 +46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40 +100%	20−22 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −65.1%	71 +65.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 +57.1%	7 −57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −33.3%	12 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −62.5%	13 +62.5%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +50%	16 −50%
Hitman 3	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +68.8%	16 −68.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −6.7%	16 +6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8 −50%	12 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −18.6%	50−55 +18.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−80%

18
+80%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −400%	20−22 +400%
Hitman 3	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −60%	40−45 +60%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

−37.5%

10−12
+37.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Hitman 3	0−1	2−3
Metro Exodus	0−1	3−4

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−40%

7−8
+40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
High Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

This is how R9 M370X and GeForce MX250 compete in popular games:

R9 M370X is 45% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M370X is 100% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX250 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games: