GeForce GTX 780M vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition with GeForce GTX 780M, including specs and performance data.

R9 M295X Mac Edition
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
13.43
+34.8%

R9 M295X Mac Edition outperforms GTX 780M by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking358418
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.42
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameAmethystN14E-GTX
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 November 2014 (9 years ago)30 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Current priceno data$1093

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481536
CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed850 MHz823 MHz
Boost clock speedno data797 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt122 Watt
Texture fill rate108.8102.0
Floating-point performance3,482 gflops2,448 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and GeForce GTX 780M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
WidthMXM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataGDDR5
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5448 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth174.3 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
HDMIno data+
HDCP content protectionno data+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMIno data+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreamingno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Supportno data+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoderno data+
Optimusno data+
3D Vision / 3DTV Playno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDAno data+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
+33.8%
71
−33.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Hitman 3 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Hitman 3 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Hitman 3 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Hitman 3 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%

This is how R9 M295X Mac Edition and GTX 780M compete in popular games:

  • R9 M295X Mac Edition is 34% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.43 9.96
Recency 23 November 2014 30 May 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 122 Watt

The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 780M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GeForce GTX 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 106 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.