Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R9 M275

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M275 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M275
2014
2 GB GDDR5
2.89

Iris Xe MAX Graphics outperforms R9 M275 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking780618
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.14no data
Power efficiencyno data14.76
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameVenusDG1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date28 January 2014 (10 years ago)31 October 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
Core clock speed900 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate37.0079.20
Floating-point processing power1.184 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs4048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M275 2.89
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 5.11
+76.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M275 1114
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 1971
+76.9%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 M275 3261
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 8214
+152%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 M275 1885
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 6333
+236%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R9 M275 11459
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 36993
+223%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R9 M275 145646
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 177442
+21.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−17.4%
27
+17.4%
1440p9−10
−88.9%
17
+88.9%
4K9−10
−77.8%
16
+77.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1800%
19
+1800%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−620%
35−40
+620%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−229%
21−24
+229%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−407%
75−80
+407%
Hitman 3 8−9
−200%
24
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−177%
60−65
+177%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1800%
57
+1800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−371%
33
+371%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−208%
35−40
+208%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−74.4%
65−70
+74.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−500%
6
+500%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−620%
35−40
+620%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−229%
21−24
+229%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−407%
75−80
+407%
Hitman 3 8−9
−188%
23
+188%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−177%
60−65
+177%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1333%
43
+1333%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−357%
30−35
+357%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−175%
33
+175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−74.4%
65−70
+74.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−229%
21−24
+229%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−407%
75−80
+407%
Hitman 3 8−9
−163%
21
+163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−18.2%
26
+18.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−142%
29
+142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−28.6%
18
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−74.4%
65−70
+74.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−257%
25
+257%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−325%
16−18
+325%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Hitman 3 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−229%
21−24
+229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−324%
70−75
+324%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−217%
18−20
+217%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 14−16
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20
+0%
20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+0%
11
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
+0%
11
+0%

This is how R9 M275 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 17% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 89% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 78% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 1800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is ahead in 61 test (86%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.89 5.11
Recency 28 January 2014 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has a 76.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M275 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M275
Radeon R9 M275
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 251 vote

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.