GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Quadro 5010M

Place in the ranking	671	10
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	8.17
Power efficiency	3.03	11.79
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GF110	GA102
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	22 February 2011 (13 years ago)	27 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	10752
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1560 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1860 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	450 Watt
Texture fill rate	21.60	625.0
Floating-point processing power	0.6912 TFLOPS	40 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	112
TMUs	48	336
Tensor Cores	no data	336
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	336 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	650 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	83.2 GB/s	1,008 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	2.0	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 5010M 4.40

RTX 3090 Ti 77.06
+1651%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 5010M 1691

RTX 3090 Ti 29625
+1652%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro 5010M 2693

RTX 3090 Ti 69481
+2480%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	38 −1611%	650−700 +1611%
Full HD	59 −273%	220 +273%
1440p	8−9 −1813%	153 +1813%
4K	6−7 −1700%	108 +1700%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	9.09
1440p	no data	13.07
4K	no data	18.51

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1408%	180−190 +1408%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −2333%	219 +2333%
Elden Ring	10−11 −2930%	300−350 +2930%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −800%	110−120 +800%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1408%	180−190 +1408%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −1022%	101 +1022%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −2221%	400−450 +2221%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −1420%	150−160 +1420%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −914%	140−150 +914%
Valorant	9−10 −4622%	400−450 +4622%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −800%	110−120 +800%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1408%	180−190 +1408%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −856%	86 +856%
Dota 2	14−16 −1221%	185 +1221%
Elden Ring	10−11 −3070%	317 +3070%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −518%	136 +518%
Fortnite	24−27 −1085%	300−350 +1085%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −2221%	400−450 +2221%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1114%	170 +1114%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −630%	73 +630%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −466%	210−220 +466%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −914%	140−150 +914%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −1060%	170−180 +1060%
Valorant	9−10 −4622%	400−450 +4622%
World of Tanks	70−75 −282%	270−280 +282%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −800%	110−120 +800%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1408%	180−190 +1408%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −744%	76 +744%
Dota 2	14−16 −1293%	195 +1293%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −559%	140−150 +559%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −2221%	400−450 +2221%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −466%	210−220 +466%
Valorant	9−10 −4622%	400−450 +4622%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	3−4 −4933%	151 +4933%
Elden Ring	5−6 −4060%	208 +4060%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −4933%	151 +4933%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 −483%	170−180 +483%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −3000%	90−95 +3000%
World of Tanks	30−35 −1565%	500−550 +1565%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −1350%	85−90 +1350%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1089%	100−110 +1089%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1200%	52 +1200%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −1500%	160−170 +1500%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −5900%	300−310 +5900%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −6700%	130−140 +6700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −3460%	170−180 +3460%
Valorant	12−14 −2900%	350−400 +2900%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −1031%	181 +1031%
Elden Ring	2−3 −5700%	116 +5700%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −1031%	181 +1031%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −1642%	200−210 +1642%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −2033%	60−65 +2033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −1031%	181 +1031%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −2175%	90−95 +2175%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2600%	27 +2600%
Dota 2	16−18 −1050%	184 +1050%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −2000%	100−110 +2000%
Fortnite	3−4 −3100%	95−100 +3100%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −5333%	160−170 +5333%
Valorant	4−5 −5150%	210−220 +5150%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%
Metro Exodus	84 +0%	84 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

100−105

+0%

100−105

+0%

This is how Quadro 5010M and RTX 3090 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 3090 Ti is 1611% faster in 900p
RTX 3090 Ti is 273% faster in 1080p
RTX 3090 Ti is 1813% faster in 1440p
RTX 3090 Ti is 1700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3090 Ti is 6700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 3090 Ti is ahead in 60 tests (95%)
there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.40	77.06
Recency	22 February 2011	27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	450 Watt

Quadro 5010M has 350% lower power consumption.

RTX 3090 Ti, on the other hand, has a 1651.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5010M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 5010M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.