UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Radeon R9 M270

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated660
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2014 (10 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64048
Core clock speed725 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors1500 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data28 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed4500 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)12_1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2014 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M270 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M270
Radeon R9 M270
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 443 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.