Data Center GPU Max 1550 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking793not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameKaveri SpectrePonte Vecchio
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 January 2014 (10 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416384
Core clock speed720 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,638
Floating-point processing powerno data52.43 TFLOPS
TMUsno data1024
Tensor Coresno data1024
Ray Tracing Coresno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataOAM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountno data128 GB
Memory bus widthno data8192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3,277 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 January 2014 10 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

Data Center GPU Max 1550 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and Data Center GPU Max 1550. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is a desktop card while Data Center GPU Max 1550 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
Data Center GPU Max 1550

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 21 vote

Rate Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 21 vote

Rate Data Center GPU Max 1550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.