GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand vs Radeon R7 350

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking602not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.06no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameCape VerdeGK104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 July 2016 (8 years ago)25 August 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121152
Core clock speed800 MHz823 MHz
Boost clock speedno data888 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate25.6085.25
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPS2.046 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3296

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s179.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 July 2016 25 August 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 130 Watt

R7 350 has an age advantage of 2 years, and 136.4% lower power consumption.

GTX 760 OEM Rebrand, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 350 and GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 481 vote

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.