GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R6 (Mullins)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R6 (Mullins) and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R6 (Mullins)
2014
0.64

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms R6 (Mullins) by a whopping 3475% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1193246
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data69.02
Power efficiencyno data26.13
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMullinsTU116
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281536
Core clock speed500 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1335 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data60 Watt
Texture fill rateno data128.2
Floating-point processing powerno data4.101 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R6 (Mullins) 0.64
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 22.88
+3475%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R6 (Mullins) 2258
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 63086
+2694%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R6 (Mullins) 20511
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 306910
+1396%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−3800%
78
+3800%
4K0−131

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.94
4Kno data7.39

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1133%
35−40
+1133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1300%
56
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2233%
70
+2233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1133%
35−40
+1133%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−873%
100−110
+873%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1183%
75−80
+1183%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−227%
95−100
+227%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2100%
66
+2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1133%
35−40
+1133%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−873%
100−110
+873%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1183%
75−80
+1183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−227%
95−100
+227%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−950%
42
+950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1567%
50
+1567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1133%
35−40
+1133%
Hitman 3 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−618%
79
+618%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1183%
75−80
+1183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−410%
51
+410%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−227%
95−100
+227%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 24−27
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2500%
24−27
+2500%
Hitman 3 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−1467%
45−50
+1467%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−13000%
130−140
+13000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1167%
35−40
+1167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 12−14

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Battlefield 5 88
+0%
88
+0%
Far Cry 5 92
+0%
92
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 120
+0%
120
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 92
+0%
92
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Battlefield 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Far Cry 5 77
+0%
77
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 95
+0%
95
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 74
+0%
74
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 54
+0%
54
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 72
+0%
72
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+0%
31
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how R6 (Mullins) and GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 3800% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 13000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is ahead in 35 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 22.88
Recency 29 April 2014 23 April 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has a 3475% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Mullins) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins)
Radeon R6 (Mullins)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R6 (Mullins) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 539 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.