Radeon RX 590 vs Pro WX 7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 7100 with Radeon RX 590, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 7100
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
20.31

RX 590 outperforms Pro WX 7100 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking270229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.7125.04
Power efficiency10.719.55
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameEllesmerePolaris 30
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)15 November 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 $279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 590 has 225% better value for money than Pro WX 7100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042304
Core clock speed1188 MHz1469 MHz
Boost clock speed1243 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate179.0222.5
Floating-point processing power5.728 TFLOPS7.119 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs144144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 7100 20.31
RX 590 24.38
+20%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 7100 7825
RX 590 9393
+20%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
−26.3%
101
+26.3%
1440p45−50
−28.9%
58
+28.9%
4K27−30
−29.6%
35
+29.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.992.76
1440p17.764.81
4K29.597.97

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−44.4%
65
+44.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−153%
86
+153%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−103%
136
+103%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−68.3%
69
+68.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−87.5%
90
+87.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−63.6%
90
+63.6%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−117%
274
+117%
Hitman 3 40−45
−22.5%
45−50
+22.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−207%
301
+207%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−74.6%
124
+74.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−65.5%
91
+65.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−106%
140
+106%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
−192%
272
+192%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−151%
113
+151%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−115%
73
+115%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−82.1%
122
+82.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−56.1%
64
+56.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−54.2%
74
+54.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−29.1%
71
+29.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−106%
259
+106%
Hitman 3 40−45
−22.5%
45−50
+22.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−193%
287
+193%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−36.6%
97
+36.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−34.5%
74
+34.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−67.6%
114
+67.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−15.2%
50−55
+15.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
−181%
261
+181%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+15.4%
39
−15.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−82.4%
62
+82.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−12.2%
46
+12.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−14.6%
55
+14.6%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+38.5%
91
−38.5%
Hitman 3 40−45
−22.5%
45−50
+22.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+2.1%
96
−2.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−47.1%
100
+47.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−10.9%
51
+10.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+166%
35
−166%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−16.4%
64
+16.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−17.9%
45−50
+17.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−19.4%
35−40
+19.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−19%
24−27
+19%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−189%
55
+189%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−65.2%
38
+65.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−16.7%
27−30
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−21.9%
130−140
+21.9%
Hitman 3 24−27
−20.8%
27−30
+20.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−71.4%
72
+71.4%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−52.6%
58
+52.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−66.7%
70
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−69.2%
203
+69.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−26.5%
43
+26.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−95%
39
+95%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−62.5%
26
+62.5%
Hitman 3 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+86%
57
−86%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−63.6%
36
+63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−52.4%
32
+52.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−58.3%
19
+58.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−320%
42
+320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−81.8%
20
+81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−54.5%
17
+54.5%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−64.3%
46
+64.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−73.9%
40
+73.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−44.4%
13
+44.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−66.7%
30
+66.7%

This is how Pro WX 7100 and RX 590 compete in popular games:

  • RX 590 is 26% faster in 1080p
  • RX 590 is 29% faster in 1440p
  • RX 590 is 30% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 166% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 590 is 320% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is ahead in 5 tests (7%)
  • RX 590 is ahead in 67 tests (93%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.31 24.38
Recency 10 November 2016 15 November 2018
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 175 Watt

Pro WX 7100 has 34.6% lower power consumption.

RX 590, on the other hand, has a 20% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 590 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 7100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 590 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
AMD Radeon RX 590
Radeon RX 590

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 55 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2497 votes

Rate Radeon RX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.