Radeon 780M vs Pro WX 4150

Place in the ranking	559	305
Place by popularity	not in top-100	48
Power efficiency	9.51	83.89
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Baffin	Hawx Point
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)	6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	768
Core clock speed	1002 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1053 MHz	2700 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	58.97	129.6
Floating-point processing power	1.887 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	56	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4150 6.91

Radeon 780M 18.28
+165%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4150 2658

Radeon 780M 7029
+164%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	12−14 −200%	36 +200%
1440p	7−8 −171%	19 +171%
4K	4−5 −225%	13 +225%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −113%	32 +113%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −179%	39 +179%
Elden Ring	18−20 −106%	37 +106%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −168%	55−60 +168%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −73.3%	26 +73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −7.1%	15 +7.1%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −132%	65 +132%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −144%	44 +144%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −115%	40−45 +115%
Valorant	21−24 −236%	70−75 +236%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −168%	55−60 +168%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −66.7%	25 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +16.7%	12 −16.7%
Dota 2	24−27 −20.8%	29 +20.8%
Elden Ring	18−20 −133%	42 +133%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −3.2%	32 +3.2%
Fortnite	40−45 −139%	95−100 +139%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −92.9%	54 +92.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −87.5%	45 +87.5%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −77.8%	32 +77.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −125%	120−130 +125%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −115%	40−45 +115%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −171%	55−60 +171%
Valorant	21−24 −236%	70−75 +236%
World of Tanks	100−110 −106%	220−230 +106%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −168%	55−60 +168%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −113%	30−35 +113%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +16.7%	12 −16.7%
Dota 2	24−27 −171%	65−70 +171%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −103%	60−65 +103%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −64.3%	46 +64.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −125%	120−130 +125%
Valorant	21−24 −236%	70−75 +236%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	7−8 −157%	18 +157%
Elden Ring	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Grand Theft Auto V	8−9 −138%	19 +138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −337%	160−170 +337%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
World of Tanks	50−55 −150%	120−130 +150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −208%	35−40 +208%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −243%	45−50 +243%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −146%	32 +146%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −310%	40−45 +310%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −150%	20 +150%
Valorant	18−20 −161%	45−50 +161%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Dota 2	18−20 −16.7%	21 +16.7%
Elden Ring	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −23.5%	21 +23.5%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −550%	12−14 +550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −23.5%	21 +23.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Dota 2	18−20 −72.2%	30−35 +72.2%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −188%	21−24 +188%
Fortnite	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −143%	17 +143%
Valorant	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

Radeon 780M is 200% faster in 1080p
Radeon 780M is 171% faster in 1440p
Radeon 780M is 225% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX 4150 is 17% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 780M is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro WX 4150 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
Radeon 780M is ahead in 61 test (97%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.91	18.28
Recency	1 March 2017	6 December 2023
Chip lithography	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt

Radeon 780M has a 164.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 780M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.