Riva TNT vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking465not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.30no data
Power efficiency13.19no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameBaffinNV4
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)23 March 1998 (26 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed1125 MHz90 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million7 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate76.860.18
Floating-point processing power2.46 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs642

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 2x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz110 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s1.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)5.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2016 23 March 1998
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 350 nm

Pro WX 4100 has an age advantage of 18 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 4100 and Riva TNT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation graphics card while Riva TNT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
NVIDIA Riva TNT
Riva TNT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 48 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 61 vote

Rate Riva TNT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.