Radeon 610M vs GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 640M GT 640M Mac Edition GT 645M GT 650M GT 650M Mac Edition GT 730M GT 745M GT 750M GT 750M Mac Edition GT 755M GT 755M Mac Edition GTX 660M
VS
Radeon 610 Radeon 610M Radeon 620 Radeon 625 Radeon 630 Radeon 660M Radeon 680M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition and Radeon 610M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 650M Mac Edition
2012
512 MB GDDR5, 45 Watt
1.59

610M outperforms GT 650M Mac Edition by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GT 650M Mac Edition GT 650M Mac Edition
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking975799
Place by popularitynot in top-10072
Power efficiency2.4213.21
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK107Dragon Range
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 July 2012 (12 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384128
Core clock speed900 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate28.8017.60
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs328
Ray Tracing Coresno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1254 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80.26 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−85.7%
13
+85.7%
1440p30−35
−103%
61
+103%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16
+0%
16
+0%
Metro Exodus 9
+0%
9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 61
+0%
61
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GT 650M Mac Edition and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 610M is 86% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 610M is 103% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.59 2.89
Recency 12 July 2012 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 610M has a 81.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 610M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 650M Mac Edition GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
vs
R7 (Kaveri) Radeon R7 (Kaveri)
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M
vs
R9 M275 Radeon R9 M275
GT 650M Mac Edition GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
vs
R7 A360 Radeon R7 A360
RTX 2050 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
vs
Playstation 4 Pro GPU Playstation 4 Pro GPU
RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6750 XT
vs
R9 M360 Radeon R9 M360
RX 580 2048SP Radeon RX 580 2048SP
vs
HD 7650A Radeon HD 7650A
RX 7700S Radeon RX 7700S
vs
HD 6650A Radeon HD 6650A
RX 7700 XT Radeon RX 7700 XT
vs
GT 750M Mac Edition GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
vs
Instinct MI6 Radeon Instinct MI6
GTX 660M GeForce GTX 660M
vs
Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 5100
GTX 660M GeForce GTX 660M
vs
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
Riva TNT Riva TNT
vs
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
Instinct MI60 Radeon Instinct MI60
vs
S7150 x2 FirePro S7150 x2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 20 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 881 vote

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition or Radeon 610M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.