GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4200 Radeon Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 8100 Radeon Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 9200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q MX450 25W MX450 30.5W 8Gbps MX450 30.5W 10Gbps

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4100 with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4100
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
9.52

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms Pro WX 4100 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 4100
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking476337
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.78no data
Power efficiency13.0523.08
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBaffinTU117
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241024
Core clock speed1125 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate76.8676.80
Floating-point processing power2.46 TFLOPS2.458 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs6464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 4100 9.52
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 16.83
+76.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4100 3660
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6469
+76.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−93.3%
58
+93.3%
1440p21−24
−95.2%
41
+95.2%
4K14−16
−85.7%
26
+85.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p13.30no data
1440p19.00no data
4K28.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
+0%
67
+0%
Metro Exodus 31
+0%
31
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Far Cry 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+0%
32
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
+0%
26
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+0%
25
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+0%
20
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how Pro WX 4100 and GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 93% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 95% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 86% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.52 16.83
Recency 10 November 2016 2 April 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has a 76.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
P104-100 P104 100
GeForce 920A GeForce 920A
vs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4070 SUPER
vs
GTX 860M OEM 860M OEM
GT 640M Mac Edition GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
vs
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile
GeForce 610 GeForce 610
vs
RTX 3080 RTX 3080
Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 5100
vs
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
FirePro W9100 FirePro W9100
vs
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
FirePro W600 FirePro W600
vs
RX Vega 3 RX Vega 3
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
PlayStation 4 GPU 4 GPU
FirePro V4900 FirePro V4900
vs
GeForce 840M GeForce 840M
FirePro V4900 FirePro V4900
vs
GeForce 820M GeForce 820M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 48 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 215 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4100 or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.