GeForce RTX 3080 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 3200 with GeForce RTX 3080, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 3200
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 65 Watt
6.26

RTX 3080 outperforms Pro WX 3200 by a whopping 945% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking57826
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.4146.30
Power efficiency6.6014.02
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 23GA102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 July 2019 (5 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3080 has 273% better value for money than Pro WX 3200.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6408704
Core clock speed1082 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1710 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate34.62465.1
Floating-point processing power1.385 TFLOPS29.77 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs32272
Tensor Coresno data272
Ray Tracing Coresno data68

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB10 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s760.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 3200 6.26
RTX 3080 65.42
+945%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 3200 2414
RTX 3080 25208
+944%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro WX 3200 4338
RTX 3080 53713
+1138%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Pro WX 3200 12538
RTX 3080 91747
+632%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro WX 3200 3156
RTX 3080 39257
+1144%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro WX 3200 18866
RTX 3080 188064
+897%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro WX 3200 105833
RTX 3080 529548
+400%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Pro WX 3200 22
RTX 3080 165
+651%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Pro WX 3200 40
RTX 3080 69
+69.8%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Pro WX 3200 32
+140%
RTX 3080 13

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Pro WX 3200 28
RTX 3080 121
+339%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Pro WX 3200 34
RTX 3080 70
+105%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Pro WX 3200 8
RTX 3080 44
+442%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Pro WX 3200 18
RTX 3080 190
+973%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Pro WX 3200 2
RTX 3080 17
+988%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
−735%
167
+735%
1440p12−14
−958%
127
+958%
4K8
−963%
85
+963%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.954.19
1440p16.585.50
4K24.888.22

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1160%
120−130
+1160%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−744%
130−140
+744%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−1288%
111
+1288%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−1061%
200−210
+1061%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−792%
110−120
+792%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1280%
138
+1280%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−721%
110−120
+721%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−783%
150−160
+783%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−468%
230−240
+468%
Hitman 3 12−14
−792%
116
+792%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−537%
240−250
+537%
Metro Exodus 24
−500%
144
+500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−671%
131
+671%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−1132%
270−280
+1132%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−386%
248
+386%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−744%
130−140
+744%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−1100%
96
+1100%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−1061%
200−210
+1061%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−792%
110−120
+792%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1240%
134
+1240%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−721%
110−120
+721%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−783%
150−160
+783%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−468%
230−240
+468%
Hitman 3 12−14
−808%
118
+808%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−537%
240−250
+537%
Metro Exodus 14
−929%
144
+929%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−1382%
326
+1382%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−595%
130−140
+595%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−367%
238
+367%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−744%
130−140
+744%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−1000%
88
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−792%
110−120
+792%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1210%
131
+1210%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−721%
110−120
+721%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−468%
230−240
+468%
Hitman 3 12−14
−746%
110
+746%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−379%
182
+379%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−1205%
287
+1205%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−1390%
149
+1390%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−98%
101
+98%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−671%
131
+671%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−1158%
150−160
+1158%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−930%
100−110
+930%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1167%
75−80
+1167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−7500%
76
+7500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1183%
75−80
+1183%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2767%
86
+2767%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1000%
75−80
+1000%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1255%
270−280
+1255%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1020%
112
+1020%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−979%
151
+979%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1683%
107
+1683%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−10850%
219
+10850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2220%
110−120
+2220%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−518%
247
+518%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−1082%
130
+1082%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1480%
75−80
+1480%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Hitman 3 2−3
−2750%
57
+2750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1218%
220−230
+1218%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−4633%
142
+4633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−2200%
115
+2200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1225%
50−55
+1225%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1633%
52
+1633%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1500%
45−50
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 43
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1433%
45−50
+1433%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1700%
100−110
+1700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−13400%
135
+13400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−2600%
54
+2600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1257%
95
+1257%

This is how Pro WX 3200 and RTX 3080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 is 735% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 is 958% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 is 963% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3080 is 13400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3080 surpassed Pro WX 3200 in all 71 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.26 65.42
Recency 2 July 2019 1 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 320 Watt

Pro WX 3200 has 392.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080, on the other hand, has a 945% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3080 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 84 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 6113 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.