RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs Radeon Pro W6600M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking223not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.82no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date8 June 2021 (3 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17927424
Core clock speed1224 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speed2034 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate227.8386.3
Floating-point processing power7.29 TFLOPS24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs112232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Cores2858

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 June 2021 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 110 Watt

Pro W6600M has 22.2% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6600M and RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.