RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon Pro W6600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6600M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro W6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 90 Watt
24.71

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Pro W6600M by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking223111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.8223.61
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23no data
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date8 June 2021 (3 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923072
Core clock speed1224 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2034 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate227.8no data
Floating-point processing power7.29 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6600M 24.71
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 39.61
+60.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6600M 9521
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 15262
+60.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
−60%
120−130
+60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−57.9%
180−190
+57.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
−54.9%
110−120
+54.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−53.8%
120−130
+53.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
−59.1%
140−150
+59.1%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−60.2%
290−300
+60.2%
Hitman 3 70−75
−48.6%
110−120
+48.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
−60%
240−250
+60%
Metro Exodus 110−120
−55.2%
180−190
+55.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
−52.9%
130−140
+52.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
−58.7%
200−210
+58.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−55.7%
190−200
+55.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
−60%
120−130
+60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−57.9%
180−190
+57.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
−54.9%
110−120
+54.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−53.8%
120−130
+53.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
−59.1%
140−150
+59.1%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−60.2%
290−300
+60.2%
Hitman 3 70−75
−48.6%
110−120
+48.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
−60%
240−250
+60%
Metro Exodus 110−120
−55.2%
180−190
+55.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
−52.9%
130−140
+52.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
−58.7%
200−210
+58.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−50.7%
110−120
+50.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−55.7%
190−200
+55.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
−60%
120−130
+60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
−54.9%
110−120
+54.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−53.8%
120−130
+53.8%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−60.2%
290−300
+60.2%
Hitman 3 70−75
−48.6%
110−120
+48.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
−60%
240−250
+60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
−58.7%
200−210
+58.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−50.7%
110−120
+50.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−55.7%
190−200
+55.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
−52.9%
130−140
+52.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−49.3%
100−105
+49.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−57.4%
85−90
+57.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−58.5%
65−70
+58.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−58.5%
65−70
+58.5%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
−50%
300−310
+50%
Hitman 3 40−45
−59.1%
70−75
+59.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−60%
120−130
+60%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−51.5%
100−105
+51.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−56.6%
130−140
+56.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−53.1%
75−80
+53.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
−56.4%
280−290
+56.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%
Hitman 3 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−59.8%
270−280
+59.8%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−58.5%
65−70
+58.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−56.3%
75−80
+56.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−59.6%
75−80
+59.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.71 39.61
Recency 8 June 2021 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 115 Watt

Pro W6600M has 27.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 60.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6600M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 19 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.