ATI Rage Mobility-M3 vs Radeon Pro W5500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking614not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameNavi 14M3
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date10 February 2020 (4 years ago)1 October 1999 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408no data
Core clock speedno data105 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Wattno data
Texture fill rate127.60.21
Floating-point performance4.083 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 2x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz105 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s840.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DB13W3

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 February 2020 1 October 1999
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 250 nm

Pro W5500M has an age advantage of 20 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5500M and Rage Mobility-M3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5500M is a mobile workstation card while Rage Mobility-M3 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M
ATI Rage Mobility-M3
Rage Mobility-M3

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rage Mobility-M3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.