Tesla A100 vs Radeon Graphics

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking894not rated
Place by popularity10not in top-100
Power efficiency9.14no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRenoirGA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)14 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4487936
Core clock speedno data1110 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data38,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate42.00550.6
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPS17.62 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs28496

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared40 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,229 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
OpenGL4.64.6

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 260 Watt

Graphics has 1633.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics and Tesla A100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics is a desktop card while Tesla A100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics
NVIDIA Tesla A100
Tesla A100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6201 vote

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 237 votes

Rate Tesla A100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.