GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon Pro Vega II

Place in the ranking	102	53
Place by popularity	not in top-100	2
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	16.76	98.57
Power efficiency	5.88	30.83
Architecture	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Vega 20	AD107
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	3 June 2019 (5 years ago)	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,199	$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4060 has 488% better value for money than Pro Vega II.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	3072
Core clock speed	1574 MHz	1830 MHz
Boost clock speed	1720 MHz	2460 MHz
Number of transistors	13,230 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	475 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	440.3	236.2
Floating-point processing power	14.09 TFLOPS	15.11 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	48
TMUs	256	96
Tensor Cores	no data	96
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Apple MPX	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	240 mm
Width	Quad-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	806 MHz	2125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	825.3 GB/s	272.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega II 40.57

RTX 4060 51.51
+27%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Vega II 15596

RTX 4060 19803
+27%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100−110 −36%	136 +36%
1440p	50−55 −38%	69 +38%
4K	30−35 −33.3%	40 +33.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	21.99 −900%	2.20 +900%
1440p	43.98 −915%	4.33 +915%
4K	73.30 −881%	7.48 +881%

RTX 4060 has 900% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 4060 has 915% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RTX 4060 has 881% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	135 +0%	135 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	139 +0%	139 +0%
Elden Ring	148 +0%	148 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	109 +0%	109 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 +0%	54 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	272 +0%	272 +0%
Metro Exodus	165 +0%	165 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Valorant	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	91 +0%	91 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	45 +0%	45 +0%
Dota 2	155 +0%	155 +0%
Elden Ring	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Far Cry 5	149 +0%	149 +0%
Fortnite	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	217 +0%	217 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	158 +0%	158 +0%
Metro Exodus	118 +0%	118 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	76 +0%	76 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +0%	40 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	190 +0%	190 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Valorant	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	90 +0%	90 +0%
Elden Ring	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	90 +0%	90 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
World of Tanks	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	46 +0%	46 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24 +0%	24 +0%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	129 +0%	129 +0%
Metro Exodus	111 +0%	111 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Dota 2	89 +0%	89 +0%
Elden Ring	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	89 +0%	89 +0%
Metro Exodus	38 +0%	38 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	89 +0%	89 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 +0%	10 +0%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Fortnite	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70 +0%	70 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

This is how Pro Vega II and RTX 4060 compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 is 36% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 is 38% faster in 1440p
RTX 4060 is 33% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	40.57	51.51
Recency	3 June 2019	18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	475 Watt	115 Watt

Pro Vega II has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4060, on the other hand, has a 27% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 313% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega II in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega II is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4060 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.