Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs Quadro P620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking464not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.31no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGP107Alder Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512640
Core clock speed1177 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1443 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate46.1852.00
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPS1.664 TFLOPS
ROPs1620
TMUs3240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length145 mmno data
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 45 Watt

Quadro P620 has 12.5% lower power consumption.

Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P620 and Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics 80EU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 607 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 156 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.