GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro Vega 56

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 56 with GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega 56
2017
8 GB HBM2, 210 Watt
31.99
+5.4%

Pro Vega 56 outperforms RTX 2070 Max-Q by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking162169
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.1518.89
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameVegaN18E-G2 MAX-Q TU106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 December 2017 (6 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data
Current price$4999 (12.5x MSRP)$1311

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Max-Q has 500% better value for money than Pro Vega 56.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842304
Core clock speed1247 MHz885-1080 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1185-1305 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt80-90 Watt
Texture fill rate280.0170.6
Floating-point performance9,677 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro Vega 56 and GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 56 31.99
+5.4%
RTX 2070 Max-Q 30.34

Radeon Pro Vega 56 outperforms GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q by 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 56 12353
+5.4%
RTX 2070 Max-Q 11719

Radeon Pro Vega 56 outperforms GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q by 5% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro Vega 56 25589
+15.8%
RTX 2070 Max-Q 22089

Radeon Pro Vega 56 outperforms GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q by 16% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pro Vega 56 17797
+2.7%
RTX 2070 Max-Q 17335

Radeon Pro Vega 56 outperforms GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q by 3% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD101
+0%
101
+0%
1440p60−65
+3.4%
58
−3.4%
4K65
+54.8%
42
−54.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 no data
Battlefield 5 100−110 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Hitman 3 65−70 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130 no data
Metro Exodus 95−100 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 no data
Battlefield 5 100−110 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Hitman 3 65−70 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130 no data
Metro Exodus 95−100 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 no data
Hitman 3 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 60−65 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 no data
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 no data

This is how Pro Vega 56 and RTX 2070 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • Pro Vega 56 is 3% faster in 1440p
  • Pro Vega 56 is 55% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.99 30.34
Recency 14 December 2017 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 80 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro Vega 56 and GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 88 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 329 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.