Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking158not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.19no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameVega 10Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 June 2017 (7 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096640
Core clock speed1250 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate345.658.00
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs6420
TMUs25640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed786 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics 80EU has an age advantage of 5 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics 80EU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 19 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 182 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.