ATI Mobility Radeon vs Pro Duo

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Duo with Mobility Radeon, including specs and performance data.

Pro Duo
2016
8 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 350 Watt
21.21
+1495%

Pro Duo outperforms ATI Mobility by a whopping 1495% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2561024
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.44no data
Power efficiency4.23no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameCapsaicinM6
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date26 April 2016 (8 years ago)1 December 2001 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Compute units128no data
Core clock speedno data144 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,900 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Wattno data
Texture fill rate256.00.43
Floating-point processing power8.192 TFLOPSno data
ROPs641
TMUs2563

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length277 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors3x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 MB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz144 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s2.304 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
Enduro+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 127.0
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.51.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Duo 21.21
+1495%
ATI Mobility 1.33

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro Duo 27110
+3829%
ATI Mobility 690

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.21 1.33
Recency 26 April 2016 1 December 2001
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

Pro Duo has a 1494.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Duo is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Duo is a workstation card while Mobility Radeon is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Radeon Pro Duo
ATI Mobility Radeon
Mobility Radeon

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 3622 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.