Mobility Radeon: specs and benchmarks
Aggregate performance score
Mobility Radeon provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 1.34% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.
Summary
ATI started Mobility Radeon sales 1 December 2001. This is a Rage 6 architecture notebook card based on 180 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use. 16 MB of DDR memory clocked at 0.14 GHz are supplied, and together with 64 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 2.304 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via AGP 4x interface.
Primary details
Some basic facts about Mobility Radeon: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
Place in the ranking | 1025 | |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
Architecture | Rage 6 (2000−2007) | |
GPU code name | M6 | |
Market segment | Laptop | |
Release date | 1 December 2001 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobility Radeon's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Mobility Radeon's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed | 144 MHz | of 2670 MHz (Arc B580) |
Number of transistors | 30 million | of 208,000 million (B200 SXM 192 GB) |
Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | of 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V) |
Texture fill rate | 0.43 | of 2,554 (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
ROPs | 1 | of 192 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) |
TMUs | 3 | of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
Form factor & compatibility
This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Mobility Radeon and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).
Interface | AGP 4x |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of memory installed on Mobility Radeon: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
Memory type | DDR | |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 MB | of 294912 (Radeon Instinct MI325X) |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | of 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory clock speed | 144 MHz | of 20000 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) |
Memory bandwidth | 2.304 GB/s | of 5,171 GB/s (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on Mobility Radeon. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
Display Connectors | No outputs |
API compatibility
APIs supported by Mobility Radeon, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX | 7.0 | |
OpenGL | 1.3 | of 4.6 (GeForce RTX 4090) |
OpenCL | N/A | |
Vulkan | N/A |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of Mobility Radeon. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Send your test results of Mobility Radeon.
NVIDIA equivalent
According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to Mobility Radeon is GeForce GT 425M, which is faster by 1% and higher by 4 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Mobility Radeon:
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.