Radeon Pro Vega II vs Pro 555X

Place in performance ranking	496	101
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	18.06
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 21	Vega 20
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	5 June 2017 (7 years ago)	3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	4096
Core clock speed	855 MHz	1574 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1720 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	475 Watt
Texture fill rate	43.54	440.3
Floating-point performance	1.393 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	Apple MPX
Width	no data	Quad-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	1612 MBps
Memory bandwidth	81.6 GB/s	825.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 555X 8.38

Pro Vega II 40.42
+382%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 555X 3235

Pro Vega II 15596
+382%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

−362%

60−65
+362%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −376%	100−105 +376%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −358%	55−60 +358%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −380%	120−130 +380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −371%	80−85 +371%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −362%	60−65 +362%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −374%	90−95 +374%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −378%	110−120 +378%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −382%	270−280 +382%
Hitman 3	16−18 −369%	75−80 +369%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −379%	230−240 +379%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −380%	120−130 +380%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −378%	110−120 +378%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −364%	130−140 +364%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −366%	270−280 +366%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −376%	100−105 +376%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −358%	55−60 +358%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −380%	120−130 +380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −371%	80−85 +371%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −362%	60−65 +362%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −374%	90−95 +374%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −378%	110−120 +378%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −382%	270−280 +382%
Hitman 3	16−18 −369%	75−80 +369%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −379%	230−240 +379%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −380%	120−130 +380%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −378%	110−120 +378%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −364%	130−140 +364%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −358%	110−120 +358%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −366%	270−280 +366%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −376%	100−105 +376%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −358%	55−60 +358%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −371%	80−85 +371%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −362%	60−65 +362%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −374%	90−95 +374%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −382%	270−280 +382%
Hitman 3	16−18 −369%	75−80 +369%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −379%	230−240 +379%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −364%	130−140 +364%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −358%	110−120 +358%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −366%	270−280 +366%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
−378%

110−120

+378%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −369%	75−80 +369%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −362%	60−65 +362%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −371%	160−170 +371%
Hitman 3	12−14 −358%	55−60 +358%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −372%	85−90 +372%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −355%	50−55 +355%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −372%	250−260 +372%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−364%

65−70
+364%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Hitman 3	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −369%	150−160 +369%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−338%

35−40

+338%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.38	40.42
Recency	5 June 2017	3 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm

Pro Vega II has a 382.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega II is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 555X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 555X is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Pro Vega II is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.