Radeon 880M vs Pro 555

Place in the ranking	513	270
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	7.47	92.80
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code name	Polaris 21	Strix Point
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	5 June 2017 (7 years ago)	15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	512
Core clock speed	850 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2900 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	40.80	92.80
Floating-point processing power	1.306 TFLOPS	2.97 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	48	32
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1275 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	81.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 555 8.15

Radeon 880M 20.24
+148%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 555 3140

Radeon 880M 7800
+148%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 555 5185

Radeon 880M 13892
+168%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro 555 3721

Radeon 880M 8371
+125%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 555 22624

Radeon 880M 51662
+128%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Pro 555 1078

Radeon 880M 3006
+179%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	34 +0%	34 +0%
1440p	9−10 −156%	23 +156%
4K	12 −125%	27−30 +125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

−131%

30−33
+131%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20 −125%	45−50 +125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Battlefield 5	32 −134%	75−80 +134%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −131%	30−33 +131%
Far Cry 5	26 −131%	60−65 +131%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −139%	55−60 +139%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −141%	130−140 +141%
Hitman 3	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +488%	8−9 −488%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −129%	55−60 +129%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −139%	55−60 +139%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	42 +950%	4−5 −950%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +104%	27−30 −104%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	26 +767%	3−4 −767%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Battlefield 5	26 −131%	60−65 +131%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −131%	30−33 +131%
Far Cry 5	21 −138%	50−55 +138%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −139%	55−60 +139%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −141%	130−140 +141%
Hitman 3	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +488%	8−9 −488%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −129%	55−60 +129%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −139%	55−60 +139%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +575%	4−5 −575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +156%	9−10 −156%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +104%	27−30 −104%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −131%	30−33 +131%
Far Cry 5	15 −133%	35−40 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	18 −122%	40−45 +122%
Hitman 3	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +488%	8−9 −488%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +575%	4−5 −575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −146%	140−150 +146%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−139%

55−60
+139%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −125%	27−30 +125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −134%	75−80 +134%
Hitman 3	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −140%	24−27 +140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −131%	120−130 +131%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+600%

2−3

−600%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Hitman 3	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −133%	70−75 +133%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
+300%

2−3

−300%

This is how Pro 555 and Radeon 880M compete in popular games:

A tie in 1080p
Radeon 880M is 156% faster in 1440p
Radeon 880M is 125% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 555 is 950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Pro 555 surpassed Radeon 880M in all 23 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.15	20.24
Recency	5 June 2017	15 July 2024
Chip lithography	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	15 Watt

Radeon 880M has a 148.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 880M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 555 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 555 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 880M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.