Radeon RX 7800 XT vs Pro 5300M

Place in the ranking	346	30
Place by popularity	not in top-100	60
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	66.95
Power efficiency	12.62	16.50
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 14	Navi 32
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 November 2019 (5 years ago)	25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	3840
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1295 MHz
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	2430 MHz
Number of transistors	6,400 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	263 Watt
Texture fill rate	100.0	583.2
Floating-point processing power	3.2 TFLOPS	37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	96
TMUs	80	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	624.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5300M 15.58

RX 7800 XT 63.04
+305%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5300M 5989

RX 7800 XT 24234
+305%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50−55 −330%	215 +330%
1440p	30−35 −307%	122 +307%
4K	18−20 −306%	73 +306%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.32
1440p	no data	4.09
4K	no data	6.84

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −793%	241 +793%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −732%	258 +732%
Elden Ring	45−50 −369%	225 +369%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −129%	110−120 +129%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −641%	200 +641%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −210%	96 +210%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −663%	488 +663%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −307%	171 +307%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −203%	110−120 +203%
Valorant	60−65 −373%	290−300 +373%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −129%	110−120 +129%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −504%	163 +504%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −158%	80 +158%
Dota 2	55−60 −218%	178 +218%
Elden Ring	45−50 −398%	230−240 +398%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −102%	113 +102%
Fortnite	85−90 −187%	240−250 +187%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −522%	398 +522%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 −218%	178 +218%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −250%	147 +250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −93.7%	210−220 +93.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −203%	110−120 +203%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −263%	170−180 +263%
Valorant	60−65 −373%	290−300 +373%
World of Tanks	190−200 −40.2%	270−280 +40.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −129%	110−120 +129%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −452%	149 +452%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −139%	74 +139%
Dota 2	55−60 −293%	220−230 +293%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −120%	120−130 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −431%	340 +431%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −93.7%	210−220 +93.7%
Valorant	60−65 −373%	290−300 +373%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	21−24 −509%	140 +509%
Elden Ring	24−27 −558%	150−160 +558%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −509%	140 +509%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 −23.2%	170−180 +23.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −443%	75−80 +443%
World of Tanks	100−110 −288%	400−450 +288%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −181%	85−90 +181%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −646%	97 +646%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −300%	48 +300%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −321%	160−170 +321%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −539%	243 +539%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −335%	148 +335%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −635%	147 +635%
Valorant	35−40 −554%	250−260 +554%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −282%	42 +282%
Dota 2	27−30 −463%	152 +463%
Elden Ring	10−12 −645%	80−85 +645%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 −463%	152 +463%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −473%	63 +473%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −354%	200−210 +354%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −463%	152 +463%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −440%	80−85 +440%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −582%	75−80 +582%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −450%	22 +450%
Dota 2	27−30 −270%	100−105 +270%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −425%	100−110 +425%
Fortnite	18−20 −433%	95−100 +433%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −491%	130 +491%
Valorant	16−18 −753%	140−150 +753%

This is how Pro 5300M and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7800 XT is 330% faster in 1080p
RX 7800 XT is 307% faster in 1440p
RX 7800 XT is 306% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 793% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 7800 XT surpassed Pro 5300M in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.58	63.04
Recency	13 November 2019	25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	263 Watt

Pro 5300M has 209.4% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 304.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5300M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.