Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 5300M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5300M and Quadro T1200 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro 5300M
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
15.42

T1200 Mobile outperforms Pro 5300M by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking345287
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.4474.08
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 14TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801024
Core clock speed1000 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate100.091.20
Floating-point processing power3.2 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
−28.9%
58
+28.9%
1440p24−27
−37.5%
33
+37.5%
4K60−65
−35%
81
+35%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−33.3%
30−35
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−25.7%
40−45
+25.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−88%
47
+88%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−30%
65−70
+30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−33.3%
30−35
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−80.6%
65
+80.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−26.2%
50−55
+26.2%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−23%
120−130
+23%
Hitman 3 27−30
−34.5%
35−40
+34.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+30%
60
−30%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−22.6%
65−70
+22.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−26.2%
50−55
+26.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−18%
59
+18%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+46.3%
54
−46.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−25.7%
40−45
+25.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−12%
28
+12%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−30%
65−70
+30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−33.3%
30−35
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−63.9%
59
+63.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−26.2%
50−55
+26.2%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−23%
120−130
+23%
Hitman 3 27−30
−34.5%
35−40
+34.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+66%
47
−66%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−30.2%
65−70
+30.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−26.2%
50−55
+26.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+13.6%
44
−13.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−91.9%
71
+91.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+68.1%
47
−68.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−25.7%
40−45
+25.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+19%
21
−19%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−33.3%
30−35
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−55.6%
56
+55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−23%
120−130
+23%
Hitman 3 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−21.8%
95−100
+21.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−20%
60−65
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
37
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+316%
19
−316%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−38.5%
18
+38.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−128%
41
+128%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−37%
110−120
+37%
Hitman 3 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+692%
12
−692%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Hitman 3 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−32.1%
100−110
+32.1%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
+0%
32
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Pro 5300M and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 29% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 38% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 35% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5300M is 692% faster.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 128% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5300M is ahead in 8 tests (12%)
  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 43 tests (63%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (25%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.42 19.45
Recency 13 November 2019 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 18 Watt

Pro 5300M has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 26.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 372.2% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5300M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 170 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 144 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.