Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon Pro 5300M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5300M with Iris Xe MAX Graphics, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5300M
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
15.42
+201%

Pro 5300M outperforms Iris Xe MAX Graphics by a whopping 201% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking345624
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.4314.03
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 14DG1
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)31 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280768
Core clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate100.079.20
Floating-point processing power3.2 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs8048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5300M 15.42
+201%
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 5.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5300M 5940
+201%
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 1971

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
+196%
27
−196%
1440p50−55
+194%
17
−194%
4K45−50
+200%
15
−200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+31.6%
19
−31.6%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+38.9%
35−40
−38.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+31.3%
30−35
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+31.6%
75−80
−31.6%
Hitman 3 27−30
+20.8%
24
−20.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+27.9%
60−65
−27.9%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−7.5%
57
+7.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+27.3%
33
−27.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+35.1%
35−40
−35.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+16.2%
65−70
−16.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+317%
6
−317%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+38.9%
35−40
−38.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+31.3%
30−35
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+31.6%
75−80
−31.6%
Hitman 3 27−30
+26.1%
23
−26.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+27.9%
60−65
−27.9%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+23.3%
43
−23.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+31.3%
30−35
−31.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+51.5%
33
−51.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+27.6%
27−30
−27.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+16.2%
65−70
−16.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+31.6%
75−80
−31.6%
Hitman 3 27−30
+38.1%
21
−38.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+200%
26
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+72.4%
29
−72.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+106%
18
−106%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+16.2%
65−70
−16.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+68%
25
−68%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+36.4%
21−24
−36.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+50%
50−55
−50%
Hitman 3 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+40%
20
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+31.9%
70−75
−31.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Hitman 3 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+50%
50−55
−50%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+36.4%
11
−36.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+36.4%
11
−36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%

This is how Pro 5300M and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5300M is 196% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 5300M is 194% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 5300M is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5300M is 317% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 8% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5300M is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.42 5.12
Recency 13 November 2019 31 October 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 25 Watt

Pro 5300M has a 201.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 240% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe MAX Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 170 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 257 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.