RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon Pro 460

Place in the ranking	485	72
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	81.77
Power efficiency	17.83	45.75
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Baffin	AD107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	30 October 2016 (8 years ago)	12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2816
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1620 MHz
Boost clock speed	907 MHz	2130 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	58.05	187.4
Floating-point processing power	1.858 TFLOPS	12 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48
TMUs	64	88
Tensor Cores	no data	88
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1270 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 460 8.95

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 45.92
+413%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 460 3452

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17715
+413%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−400%

190−200
+400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

3.42

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−400%

70−75
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −400%	110−120 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −400%	65−70 +400%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −381%	130−140 +381%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −400%	90−95 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −400%	70−75 +400%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −380%	120−130 +380%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −400%	300−310 +400%
Hitman 3	16−18 −400%	85−90 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −400%	250−260 +400%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −400%	140−150 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −380%	120−130 +380%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −383%	140−150 +383%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −400%	300−310 +400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −400%	110−120 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −400%	65−70 +400%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −381%	130−140 +381%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −400%	90−95 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −400%	70−75 +400%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −380%	120−130 +380%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −400%	300−310 +400%
Hitman 3	16−18 −400%	85−90 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −400%	250−260 +400%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −400%	140−150 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −380%	120−130 +380%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −383%	140−150 +383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −380%	120−130 +380%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −400%	300−310 +400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −400%	110−120 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −400%	65−70 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −400%	90−95 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −400%	70−75 +400%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −400%	300−310 +400%
Hitman 3	16−18 −400%	85−90 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −400%	250−260 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −383%	140−150 +383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 −400%	85−90 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −400%	300−310 +400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
−380%

120−130

+380%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −400%	85−90 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −400%	70−75 +400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −400%	45−50 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −400%	45−50 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −386%	180−190 +386%
Hitman 3	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −400%	95−100 +400%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −409%	290−300 +409%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−400%

75−80
+400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −400%	180−190 +400%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −400%	55−60 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
−400%

45−50

+400%

This is how Pro 460 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.95	45.92
Recency	30 October 2016	12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	70 Watt

Pro 460 has 100% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 413.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 460 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 460 is a mobile workstation card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.