Quadro M1000M vs Radeon Pro 460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 460 and Quadro M1000M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro 460
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
8.95
+20.9%

Pro 460 outperforms M1000M by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking485530
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.76
Power efficiency17.8212.89
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameBaffinGM107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date30 October 2016 (8 years ago)18 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$200.89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024512
Core clock speed850 MHz993 MHz
Boost clock speed907 MHz1072 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate58.0531.78
Floating-point processing power1.858 TFLOPS1.017 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs6432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB/4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA-5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 460 8.95
+20.9%
M1000M 7.40

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 460 3452
+21%
M1000M 2853

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 460 6749
+59.6%
M1000M 4230

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro 460 4584
+31.1%
M1000M 3498

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 460 27064
+15.5%
M1000M 23422

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD38
−2.6%
39
+2.6%
4K14−16
+7.7%
13
−7.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.15
4Kno data15.45

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+22.4%
45−50
−22.4%
Hitman 3 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+16.3%
40−45
−16.3%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+25%
20−22
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+16%
24−27
−16%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+22.4%
45−50
−22.4%
Hitman 3 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+16.3%
40−45
−16.3%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+25%
20−22
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+16%
24−27
−16%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−148%
62
+148%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+22.4%
45−50
−22.4%
Hitman 3 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+16.3%
40−45
−16.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+16%
24−27
−16%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+54.5%
11
−54.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+25%
20−22
−25%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Hitman 3 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+21.3%
45−50
−21.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Hitman 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+44%
24−27
−44%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−16.7%
7
+16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

This is how Pro 460 and M1000M compete in popular games:

  • M1000M is 3% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 460 is 8% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 460 is 150% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the M1000M is 148% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 460 is ahead in 69 tests (96%)
  • M1000M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.95 7.40
Recency 30 October 2016 18 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB/4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 40 Watt

Pro 460 has a 20.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 460 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M1000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro 460
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Quadro M1000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 35 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 540 votes

Rate Quadro M1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.