GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon PRO WX 9100

Place in the ranking	176	362
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	11.02	3.06
Power efficiency	9.61	5.13
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Vega 10	GK104
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	10 July 2017 (7 years ago)	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,599	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO WX 9100 has 260% better value for money than GTX 680.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	1536
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	1006 MHz
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	1058 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	195 Watt
Texture fill rate	384.0	135.4
Floating-point processing power	12.29 TFLOPS	3.25 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	256	128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	254 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	2x 6-pin
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	2048 MB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	256-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed	945 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	483.8 GB/s	192.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	no data	4 displays
HDMI	-	+
HDCP	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.2
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.1.126
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO WX 9100 32.05
+121%

GTX 680 14.51

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 9100 12320
+121%

GTX 680 5576

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

PRO WX 9100 66605
+262%

GTX 680 18381

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

PRO WX 9100 67893
+287%

GTX 680 17522

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	95−100 +111%	45 −111%
Full HD	160−170 +113%	75 −113%
4K	55−60 +112%	26 −112%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	9.99 −50.2%	6.65 +50.2%
4K	29.07 −51.5%	19.19 +51.5%

GTX 680 has 50% lower cost per frame in 1080p
GTX 680 has 51% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Elden Ring	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Valorant	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Dota 2	37 +0%	37 +0%
Elden Ring	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Fortnite	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	56 +0%	56 +0%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	47 +0%	47 +0%
Valorant	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
World of Tanks	224 +0%	224 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Dota 2	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Valorant	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Elden Ring	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
World of Tanks	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Valorant	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	21 +0%	21 +0%
Elden Ring	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	21 +0%	21 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21 +0%	21 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Dota 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Fortnite	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Valorant	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

This is how PRO WX 9100 and GTX 680 compete in popular games:

PRO WX 9100 is 111% faster in 900p
PRO WX 9100 is 113% faster in 1080p
PRO WX 9100 is 112% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	32.05	14.51
Recency	10 July 2017	22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	2048 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	195 Watt

PRO WX 9100 has a 120.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 680, on the other hand, has 17.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO WX 9100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 680 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 9100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 680 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.